|
Negligent Security
Lawyers
While private property owners generally do not have a duty to protect those on their property
from third party attacks, property owners do have an obligation to provide a reasonably safe
environment. The relationship the property owner has with those on its property and the
foreseeability of a potential attack may require additional measures, however, for the owner of a
property to meet such an obligation.
If someone is invited as a guest or for business reasons (including patrons of a business),
there is often a duty of care on a property owner to take reasonable safety precautions.
Reasonable precautions may include keeping common areas and hallways well lit, providing sturdy
locks on doors and windows, making sure that suspicious-looking people are not loitering on the
premises, and posting warnings of potential security hazards.
A criminal attack is considered foreseeable if it could have or should have been reasonably
anticipated, or if a person exercising ordinary caution would expect it to take place under the
existing circumstances. Florida does recognize the foreseeability of an attack under several
circumstances. Here are some scenarios which may create liability for an inadequate security
lawsuit:
- Did the owner have knowledge of a threat by a specific perpetrator at a specific
time?
- Was there evidence of violent or other crimes on or around the premises?
- Can foreseeability have been determined after considering the layout and location of
the premises, the nature of the business conducted, or other relevant factors?
- Were security measures adopted sufficient when balancing their cost and availability
against the foreseeable likelihood and severity of a crime?
- Did the security service hired by the property owner use reasonable care under the
circumstances to prevent the attack?
When a property owner fails to provide reasonable security measures, it may be exposing him or
herself to liability for injuries that are determined to have been caused by a breach of his or her
legal duty. Reasonable security measures may include:
- contracting a reliable and qualified security service
- installing security systems and actively monitoring security cameras
- developing building access control measures
- creating a security plan
- employing one-use hotel room key cards
- installing ATM panic buttons
Another measure many businesses take in order to protect themselves against claims for
their failure to take reasonable precautions is to carry premises liability insurance. Attorneys
who work on behalf of the property owner or his or her insurance company are likely to use one of
the following arguments to avoid legal responsibility for injuries arising from criminal assaults
on their property:
- comparative negligence
-
- the victim failed to exercise reasonable care and therefore was at least partially
responsible for the injury
- Liability for the injuries should be apportioned between their own breach of duty and that
of the conduct of the perpetrator
- The perpetrator's criminal profile is such that no reasonable security measures would have
deterred him or her from committing the crime
Negligent security lawsuits often involve preventable human suffering. But in order to prevail,
you need the assistance of an experienced premises liability attorney who can investigate the
claim, gather evidence through subpoena power, and employ the services of security
experts to determine the merits of your negligent security lawsuit.
Please contact our personal injury lawyers today to assess your
negligent security claim.
|